Author's Guidelines

Authors who wish to submit manuscripts to International Digital Hadith and Qur'an are required to carefully follow the journal’s author guidelines and manuscript template. The journal accepts original scholarly manuscripts that are relevant to its focus and scope, particularly in the areas of public policy, governance, politics, law, rights, citizenship, society, religion, social change, humanities, culture, communication, education, development, and human welfare.

Manuscripts submitted to this journal must be original, have not been previously published, and must not be under consideration for publication in another journal. Authors are responsible for ensuring that the manuscript complies with academic writing standards, publication ethics, plagiarism policy, citation rules, and the technical formatting requirements of the journal.

All manuscripts must be written in English and prepared using the official manuscript template of International Digital Hadith and Qur'an. The body text should use Times New Roman, 12 pt, with clear, formal, and academic language. Authors are advised to ensure that the manuscript has been carefully proofread before submission.

1. Manuscript Format

The manuscript must be prepared according to the journal template. The general format is as follows:

Title
The title must be concise, specific, informative, and clearly reflect the main subject of the article. The title should avoid unnecessary words and should represent the research focus accurately. The title is written in Times New Roman, 20 pt, bold, and centered.

Author Name and Affiliation
The manuscript must include the full names of all authors, institutional affiliations, city, and country. The corresponding author must be clearly identified and must provide an active email address. Authors should ensure that the order of authors reflects their actual contribution to the manuscript.

Corresponding Author Information
The corresponding author section should include the author’s name, faculty or department, institution, city, country, and email address. The corresponding author will be responsible for communication with the editorial team during the submission, revision, and publication process.

2. Abstract

The abstract must be written in English and should contain a concise summary of the entire article. The abstract should be between 200 and 250 words.

The abstract should include the following elements:

1. The background or main problem of the study;
2. The objective of the research;
3. The method, approach, or framework used in the study;
4. The main findings or significant results;
5. The novelty, implication, or contribution of the study.

The abstract must be informative, clear, and easy to understand. It should briefly explain why the research is important, what problem is being addressed, how the research was conducted, what findings were obtained, and how the findings contribute to the field.

Authors should avoid using citations, references, footnotes, tables, figures, or unexplained abbreviations in the abstract. Since the abstract represents the entire content of the article, authors are advised to write or revise the abstract after completing the full manuscript.

3. Keywords

Authors must provide three to five keywords that represent the main topic, object, method, and focus of the study. Keywords should help readers and indexing databases identify the content of the article.

Keywords should be written below the abstract. Each keyword should be separated by a semicolon (;), and the final keyword should end with a period (.).

Example:

Keywords: Public policy; Human rights;Social change;Cultural studies; Governance.

4. Introduction

The introduction must provide a clear and logical background of the study. This section should explain the context of the research, the main problem, the urgency of the issue, relevant previous studies, the research gap, and the contribution or novelty of the article.

The introduction should be written in paragraph form, not in bullet points. Authors should develop a coherent argument that shows why the research is necessary and how it contributes to the existing body of knowledge.

The introduction should include:

1. General background of the topic;
2. Specific research problem;
3. Review of relevant previous studies;
4. Identification of the research gap;
5. Research objective;
6. Novelty or contribution of the study.

The literature cited in the introduction should be relevant and recent, preferably published within the last five years. Authors are required to cite at least five relevant references in the introduction. The introduction should comprise approximately 15–20% of the total manuscript.

All citations must follow the APA citation style, for example: (Author, year), (Author & Author, year), (Author et al., year).

5. Research Method

The research method section must explain clearly how the study was conducted. This section should describe the research design, approach, data sources, data collection techniques, data analysis procedures, and research framework used by the author.

Depending on the type of research, this section may include qualitative, quantitative, mixed-method, normative legal, doctrinal legal, socio-legal, policy analysis, discourse analysis, case study, ethnography, literature review, or other relevant approaches.

The research method section should include:

1. Research Design
   Authors should explain the type and design of the research. For example, qualitative descriptive research, quantitative survey research, policy analysis, legal analysis, case study, or literature review.
2. Data Sources
   Authors should describe the sources of data used in the study, such as interviews, documents, legal texts, policy documents, survey data, observation, media content, archival materials, or academic literature.
3. Data Collection Techniques
   Authors should explain how the data were collected. This may include interviews, questionnaires, document analysis, observation, focus group discussion, literature study, or other relevant techniques.
4. Data Analysis Techniques
   Authors should describe the method used to analyze the data. For example, thematic analysis, content analysis, discourse analysis, statistical analysis, comparative analysis, legal interpretation, or policy evaluation.
5. Research Procedure
   Authors should explain the stages of the research so that readers can understand how the study was carried out systematically.
6. Ethical Considerations
   If the study involves human participants, interviews, surveys, personal data, or sensitive information, authors must explain the ethical procedures used, including informed consent, confidentiality, anonymity, and ethical clearance where applicable.

The research method section should be written clearly and sufficiently so that the research process can be understood and evaluated by readers and reviewers. This section should comprise approximately 10–15% of the total manuscript.

 

6. Results and Discussion

The Results and Discussion section presents the findings of the study in a clear, logical, and systematic manner, followed by an analysis and interpretation of those results. This section should not only describe the data but also explain their significance in relation to the research objectives, theoretical framework, and previous studies. It is essential that authors do not merely present the data, but also interpret the findings, providing explanations and discussing their implications.

Authors should ensure that the results are clearly and effectively communicated. The use of tables, figures, charts, and diagrams is encouraged to present complex data in an accessible and concise manner. However, these should be used only when they enhance the understanding of the findings. Each table and figure should be followed by a caption and must be referred to explicitly in the text.

This section must include:

1. Presentation of Research Findings

The research findings should be presented logically and systematically, using both narrative and visual aids (e.g., tables, figures). When presenting quantitative results, ensure that statistical analyses (e.g., p-values, confidence intervals) are clearly stated, and when presenting qualitative findings, provide relevant examples or quotes that highlight key points.

• Ensure clarity and coherence in the presentation of findings.
• Where appropriate, use statistical charts, graphs, or tables to summarize the data effectively.
• For qualitative research, present key themes, patterns, or narratives derived from the data.

1. Interpretation of the Findings

Once the findings are presented, authors must interpret them in relation to the research questions, objectives, and hypotheses. This interpretation is crucial for connecting the results to broader concepts, theories, or frameworks discussed earlier in the manuscript.

• Explain what the results mean in the context of the study’s research questions.
• Discuss any unexpected findings or results that deviate from the hypotheses or literature.
• Provide insights into how the findings contribute to understanding the problem or issue at hand.

1. Explanation of Why the Findings Occurred

Authors should provide a rationale for why certain results were observed. This includes discussing potential factors or variables that might have influenced the findings, such as external circumstances, sample characteristics, methodological choices, or theoretical assumptions.

• Explain any significant patterns or trends identified in the results.
• Offer explanations for anomalies or unexpected results, drawing upon the study's context, methodology, or previous research.
• Provide potential causal mechanisms or factors contributing to the observed findings.

1. Relationship Between Findings and Research Objectives

It is essential to relate the research findings directly to the original research objectives, goals, or hypotheses. Authors should make explicit connections between the results and the research questions posed in the introduction and methodology sections.

• Discuss how the findings address the research problem or contribute to the understanding of the issue.
• Highlight whether the research objectives were met and to what extent the study contributes to the existing body of knowledge in the field.
• Discuss how the results align with or diverge from previous research and theoretical expectations.

1. Comparison with Previous Studies

Authors must compare their findings with those of previous studies in the literature. This comparison helps contextualize the study's results and provides a basis for evaluating the study’s contributions. It also helps to validate the reliability and robustness of the findings.

• Compare and contrast your results with relevant research from the literature review.
• Discuss whether your results support or challenge the findings of previous studies.
• Highlight any new insights your study provides compared to existing research.

1. Discussion of Theoretical, Practical, Legal, Social, or Policy Implications

The findings should be interpreted in terms of their broader implications. Authors should discuss how the results contribute to theoretical developments in the field and their practical, legal, social, or policy implications.

• Theoretical implications: How do the results extend or refine existing theories in the field? Do the findings suggest a need for new theoretical frameworks or modifications to current understanding?
• Practical implications: What do the findings suggest for practitioners, policymakers, or other stakeholders in the field? How can the results be applied in real-world settings?
• Legal and policy implications: If applicable, discuss how the findings could inform legal practices, regulatory frameworks, or policy reforms.
• Social implications: Address the social relevance of the findings, particularly in terms of public impact, community development, or social change.

1. Explanation of the Novelty or Contribution of the Findings

Authors should explicitly state the novelty or unique contribution of their findings. What is new or innovative about the research? How does this study advance the field or offer new insights into the topic?

• Clearly identify the novel aspects of your research. Is it the methodology, the findings, or the theoretical insights?
• Discuss how your study adds to existing literature and how it may influence future research directions.
• Provide a brief summary of the main contribution of your study to the field of policy, law, society, or humanities.

 

8. Tables and Figures

Tables and figures must be used only when necessary and must be clearly explained in the text before they appear.

Tables
Tables must be placed in the center of the page. The table title should be placed above the table. The table content should use Times New Roman, 10 pt. Authors should avoid unnecessary vertical and horizontal lines. Tables should be numbered consecutively.

Example:

Table 1. Research Participants

Figures
Figures, graphs, charts, or images must be placed in the center of the page. The figure caption should be placed below the figure. All figures must be clear, readable, and relevant to the manuscript.

Example:

Figure 1. Framework of Policy Analysis

Authors must ensure that all tables and figures are referred to in the text and are not presented without explanation.

9. Conclusion

The conclusion must answer the research objectives or research questions stated in the introduction. It should summarize the main findings and explain their significance.

The conclusion should be concise, clear, and not repetitive. Authors should avoid introducing new data or new arguments in this section.

The conclusion may include:

1. Summary of main findings;
2. Research contribution;
3. Theoretical or practical implications;
4. Policy recommendations, if relevant;
5. Limitations of the study;
6. Suggestions for future research.

 

10. Acknowledgements

The acknowledgements section is optional. Authors may acknowledge individuals or institutions that contributed to the research or manuscript preparation but do not meet the criteria for authorship.

Acknowledgements may include:

1. Research funders;
2. Institutions that provided data or access;
3. Supervisors or advisors;
4. Research assistants;
5. Proofreaders or language editors;
6. Participants or informants, where appropriate.

Authors should ensure that all acknowledged parties have given permission to be mentioned.

11. Declarations

All manuscripts must include a declarations section. This section should provide transparency regarding AI usage, author contributions, funding, and conflicts of interest.

11.1 AI Usage Statement

Authors must declare whether generative AI tools were used in preparing the manuscript. If AI tools were used, authors must clearly explain the name of the tool, the purpose of use, and which parts of the manuscript were assisted by AI.

Example:

AI Usage Statement:
The authors used generative AI tools for language editing and grammar checking. The authors reviewed, verified, and took full responsibility for the final content of the manuscript.

If no AI tool was used, authors may write:

AI Usage Statement:
The authors declare that no generative AI tools were used in the preparation of this manuscript.

11.2 Author Contribution

Authors must describe the contribution of each author to the manuscript. The contribution may include conceptualization, methodology, data collection, data analysis, writing, editing, supervision, or funding acquisition.

Example:

Author Contribution:
Author 1 contributed to conceptualization, methodology, and manuscript writing. Author 2 contributed to data collection and analysis. Author 3 contributed to supervision, review, and editing.

11.3 Funding Statement

Authors must disclose all sources of funding that supported the research or publication of the article.

Example:

Funding Statement:
This research was funded by [name of institution/funding body], grant number [if applicable].

If there is no funding, authors may write:

Funding Statement:
This research received no external funding.

11.4 Conflict of Interest

Authors must declare whether there is any conflict of interest related to the research, authorship, or publication of the article.

Example:

Conflict of Interest:
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

12. References

All references must be written using APA citation style. In-text citations must be written using author(s) and year of publication, for example (Author, Year), (Author & Author, Year), or (Author et al., Year).

Example Reference List:

Journal Article:
Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (Year). Title of article. Title of Journal, Volume(Issue), page range. https://doi.org/xxxxx

Book:
Author, A. A. (Year). Title of book (Edition). Publisher.

Conference Paper:
Author, A. A. (Year). Title of conference paper. In Proceedings of the Conference Name (pp. xx-xx). Publisher. https://doi.org/xxxxx

Authors must ensure that all sources cited in the text are listed in the reference section and that all references listed are cited in the manuscript.

13. Submission Preparation Checklist

Before submitting a manuscript, authors must ensure that:

1. The manuscript is original and has not been published elsewhere;
2. The manuscript is not under review by another journal;
3. The topic is relevant to the focus and scope of the journal;
4. The manuscript follows the official journal template;
5. The manuscript is written in English;
6. The abstract contains 200–250 words;
7. The manuscript includes 3–5 keywords;
8. The introduction includes recent and relevant literature;
9. The method section is clear and systematic;
10. Tables and figures are properly numbered and explained;
11. The conclusion answers the research objectives;
12. The declaration section is complete;
13. References follow APA style;
14. The manuscript includes at least 20 international journal references;
15. The manuscript has been checked for plagiarism and grammar.

14. Manuscript Submission

Manuscripts must be submitted through the online submission system of International Digital Hadith and Qur'an. Authors are required to register or log in to the journal website before submitting their manuscript.

During submission, authors must upload the manuscript file and complete all required metadata, including title, abstract, keywords, author names, affiliations, and references.

Manuscripts that do not follow the author guidelines or journal template may be returned to the authors for correction before entering the peer review process.